Top

Lone Challenger in Fishers Town Council Race Aims to Change ‘Arrogant’ Mindset

October 4, 2007 by lauragates 

Greg Purvis Art LevineJust one of the seven Fishers Town Council seats is being contested in the Nov. 6 election, and the sole challenger, Democrat Greg Purvis, is definitely vocal about his opposition to “politics as usual” in Fishers.

Purvis contends that current council members are arrogant, unresponsive to citizens and fiscally irresponsible – pushing a hard line on the Geist annexation because, quite simply, they need the money.

“There’s so much red ink, it’s shocking,” said Purvis, adding that the newly passed 2008 budget contains a $36 million deficit.

Purvis’ opponent in District 4 is Republican Art Levine, the newest addition to the council, joining in Spring 2006 after his predecessor relocated to Florida. Although Levine was the only council member who voted against the 2008 budget (saying the 5 percent increase in the tax rate was slightly higher than original estimates), he’s quick to point out that Fishers’ tax rate remains one of the lowest in the state for a town of its size.

Levine and Purvis differ on just about every issue facing the town. Where Levine sees forced annexation and the use of eminent domain as necessary tools for a thriving town, Purvis simply sees greed.

“It’s development at any expense, and it’s wrong,” he said.

Purvis, who’s on the HOA board for Sandstone, points to the council’s forced annexation attempts on the un-incorporated areas of Geist as an effort to “grab the tax revenue from Geist, pure and simple.” He argues the decision to annex should be based on the will of the majority in that area.

Levine, who lives in Hamilton Proper, is a neighbor to many of the homeowners in the contested area of Geist.

“I would go on record saying I regret the animosity it has created,” Levine said. However, he added, “Towns and cities need to grow, and annexation is a natural part of that.”

He says he understands concerns about individual liberties, but “the good that greater Fishers can bring to everybody far outweighs those issues.” He points to the new St. Vincent Medical Center at Ind. 238 and Olio Road as adding to the quality of life Fishers residents enjoy. The stronger Fishers is as a community, the more negotiating power the town has to bring in desirable businesses, Levine said. If East and West Geist are incorporated as towns apart from Fishers, there won’t be much room for that area to add amenities or bring in businesses to boost the tax base, he said.

“I want people in that area to have a voice and not be in an area with no opportunity to grow,” Levine said.

Another area of contention is the proposed Town Center Development, which would require demolishing Fishers Elementary and possibly using eminent domain to forcibly acquire land. Bonds may be issued to create a tax increment financing (TIF) district.

“I oppose the use of public funding for this private development, and for the use of borrowed funds to tear down and replace a public school at taxpayer expense,” Purvis said.

Traffic is another concern high on the list of both candidates. Purvis contends that the new Riverplace Development planned for 96th and Allisonville will make the already busy intersection look like “Castleton at Christmas.”

“They don’t care if it creates traffic problems; they don’t care if it floods land up and down the riverbank,” Purvis said. “They just need money.”

Levine agrees traffic will increase but says it’s a necessary evil for a growing community. “The alternative is no growth, no traffic and higher taxes. I don’t think that’s an alternative anybody wants.”

If elected, Purvis would surely face frustration as the lone voice of opposition on the Fishers Town Council. But as a lawyer, father and grandfather, Purvis says he’s well-prepared. He just wants all Fishers residents to have a voice.

So, now it’s up to you. Head to the polls on Nov. 6 and make your voice heard!

Comments

3 Responses to “Lone Challenger in Fishers Town Council Race Aims to Change ‘Arrogant’ Mindset”

  1. Rich on October 5th, 2007 4:19 pm

    An important set of facts not to ignore.
    The best way to determine the debt load a city or town has and thusly how much tax revenue is needed for that debt is the ratio of debt to assessed value.

    Fishers debt is about 2% of their total assessed value. (actually slightly less than 2%) Fishers also has a bond rating of AA- which is almost the highest you can have.

    By contrast Fishers’ neighbors to the north and west are in a far worse situation. Carmel, even with its’ higher assessed value, still has a debt ratio of almost 5.5%. Noblesville with a far lesser assessed value has a debt ratio of around 7%. Both of those statistics go to show that Fishers has not over spent itself and does not “need the money” as Mr. Purvis claims.

    The article and Mr. Purvis fails to mention that the budget is in fact balanced and the town will not be in the “red” as Mr. Purvis claims. All expenses will be paid in this budget.

    If one thing can be said for the annexations, it would be that the town does not need their added tax base as much as their added assessed value. It is a Fishers statute that does not allow them to borrow or go into debt more than 2% of their assessed value to keep them from the same problems of Carmel and Noblesville. If you simply add the assessed value to the town it will allow the town to have the needed room in the debt ratio to complete more capital projects for all citizens.

  2. Gregory A. Purvis on October 6th, 2007 6:51 am

    The 2008 Fishers Budget, which is more than twice as large as the 2006 Budget, is in fact a deficit budget, a fact which tends to be hidden by some slight-of-hand. This budget in fact has a deficit of about $36 million of expenses over “real” revenues. Of the “income” listed in the budget is about $25 million in bond revenue… borrowed money. Then to cover a gross shortfall in the general fund, they take $11.5 million from the sewer fund. To then make up for the money going out of the sewer fund, they create a new storm sewer user fee (tax) and guess what, sell sewer bonds to do the sewer projects that they have the money for, but they just transferred out to cover the general fund shortage. Yes, all expenses will be paid this year, just with bond money that is in fact being borrowed to pay general expenses, which is contrary to state law and the state constitution, at least in principle. The writer is correct that Carmel’s debt situation is worse than Fishers’, a situation that many candidates in Carmel are addressing, including my fellow Democrats. I just don’t want MY city to get into that kind of debt with this kind of budget. Interesting how Hamilton County Democrats are teaching Republicans about fiscal responsibility. It seems years of one-party government has led to loss of direction.

  3. Bruce Black on October 8th, 2007 6:45 pm

    My best wishes go to Mr. Purvis in his campaign to secure a seat on the Fishers Town Council. As a lifelong Republican, it pains me to say that the one-party composition of the Council must have something to do with the arrogance, fiscal irresponsibility and “ram it down their throats” diplomacy. God bless you if you can make any kind of difference in this den of thieves.





Bottom